Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life?
roberthuff at rcn.com
Sun Jan 7 22:59:58 UTC 2007
Mark Lu writes:
> So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something?
> Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old
> if it works, right?
As I understand the discussion: among others, because there are
features people want to add that don't fit in the current model.
(Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user
behavior is not intuitively obvious.)
More information about the freebsd-questions