Emacs vs XEmacs: which to choose for plain console using?

[Greg 'groggy' Lehey]

On Wednesday,  3 January 2007 at 22:50:55 +0200, Andrey Slusar wrote:
> Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:41:57 +0200, a at zeos.net wrote:
>
>> What are advantages and disadvantages of xemacs over emacs?
>> Which to choose for plain console using?
>
> Emacs "by default" is very usable in plain FreeBSD ?onsole, also
> XEmacs is not.

I haven't seen this.  I use Emacs, and I'd prefer to continue to do
so, but some systems I work on only provide Xemacs.  I haven't really
seen any difference in non-windowed mode.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20070104/2a797b50/attachment.pgp