Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful.
perrin at apotheon.com
Fri Dec 14 12:19:23 PST 2007
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:26:28PM +0000, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:09:41 -0700
> Chad Perrin <perrin at apotheon.com> wrote:
> > Hmm -- fair answer. I was kind of thinking that on FreeBSD I should
> > maybe do such work in csh as the standard shell, but it occurs to me
> > that I'd probably be pretty hard-pressed to find a FreeBSD system
> > without sh on it.
> csh isn't the standard shell, it's just the default login shell for
> root. All of the installed shell scripts are for sh, and the
> sysinstall default for ordinary users is sh.
> I think it's just the case that sysinstall doesn't have normal user
> setup page for the root account, so it's sets a sensible default shell
> for interactive use.
Thanks for clarifying that point.
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Kent Beck: "I always knew that one day Smalltalk would replace Java. I
just didn't know it would be called Ruby."
More information about the freebsd-questions