Maybe this is a bug, should I report it?
wmoran at potentialtech.com
Wed Dec 5 06:21:26 PST 2007
In response to "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm at prime.gushi.org>:
> But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2, when
> gpg is still in the tree?
> I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2
Show us the output that demonstrates this problem.
My first guess is that it's not portupgrade that's doing it, but that
some port you're upgrading now lists gpg2 as a dependency instead of
gpg, which causes the attempted installation.
But I'm just speculating without more details.
More information about the freebsd-questions