Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the
relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory
>3.5GB not used?))
dickey at radix.net
Wed Apr 25 20:21:48 UTC 2007
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other
> sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this
> particular brand of intellectually lazy person to realize that about the
> printed page, though.
I recall reading some interesting comments from studies (second hand, e.g.,
in Science News) which stated that people tended to believe things that
were presented in a credible fashion, not questioning them - using the
paper or page as an authority which amplified their own general beliefs
on a topic.
Aside from the circular referencing that occurs when believing that...
It's certainly hard to see where/how to decide to stop and question the
authority, given that premise (knowing that one is biased). But it's
perhaps a good habit to get into - observing that reading things that
one already agrees with are perhaps as problematic as those that one
Thomas E. Dickey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20070425/9b3e8aba/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions