Word processor for 6.1
nikolas.britton at gmail.com
Tue Sep 5 06:48:05 PDT 2006
On 9/5/06, RW <list-freebsd-2004 at morbius.sent.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 September 2006 09:35, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> > In the standard-supfile for the base system you'd specify RELENG_6 which
> > means you'll get head of -STABLE, or if you are conservative RELENG_6_1
> > which means that you'll just get security patches to the 6.1 release.
> I do wish people wouldn't give inexperienced users the impresssion that
> running 6-stable (RELENG_6 ) is the norm - this is a development branch.
Unfortunately it does feel like the norm. My servers are running
6-STABLE because the hardware is not fully supported in 6.1-RELEASE. I
had the same problems when 6.0-RELEASE was rolled out. Maybe we should
cut 6.2 early? that or time are release dates so they match up with
Intel's chipset release dates.
BSD Podcasts @:
More information about the freebsd-questions