6.1-RC2: strange kernel panic!

[No at SPAM at mgEDV.net]

> Don't you think you should test it instead of guessing? :-) I suggested
> it because it *is* a possibility (that is why I have it in my kernel).
yes, but doesn't it make sense to find memory consuming things
before adding more?
btw. how can we check for such things?

> Are you sure you are using swap backing and not malloc?
nope, i'm not sure if it was that, but -M was passed to mdmfs,
so malloc(9) was used. we changed the code to swap-based, let's
see if that fixes our problem.