Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ?
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
chad at shire.net
Thu Jun 29 19:30:01 UTC 2006
On Jun 29, 2006, at 8:41 AM, David Robillard wrote:
> Well, there are two issues here: access time (rpm) and storage
> capacity (GB). The access time deals with rotational speed of the
> drives (rpm) while storage capacity (GB) does not care how fast the
> drive spins.
There is a third and that is bit density. The reason that that is
important is that it can compensate for a slower drive (rotational
speed). If a fast drive with lower bit density has to rotate X
rotation to get to the data, a higher bit density drive will usually
have to rotate something less than X because the data is more dense.
In simple terms (these numbers are made up to illustrate this and
have no bearing on real numbers except that the concept holds: a
fast RPM with lower bit density might have 1GB per cylinder and hence
say 2/3 of a rotation might be needed to get data X. A higher
density drive might have 6GB per cylinder so needs only, say 1/9 of a
slower rotation to get to the same data). This was amply
illustrated by some 500GB SATA benchmark I read that had it equaling
some much faster RPM drives for access time with much lower bit
density. Other factors play in here as well but hopefully you get
the idea.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list