speccing an NFS server -- smp good or bad?
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
chad at shire.net
Mon Jan 9 09:18:42 PST 2006
On Jan 9, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an
>> NFS server and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an
>> SMP machine? Any
>
> no. one CPU is powerful enough. pentium 200 class machine does have
> no problems working as NFS server for 100Mbit/s LAN at full speed,
> assuming disk is able to cope with.
>
>> disadvantage?
>>
>> Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use a 1.8ghz opteron
>> instead of a 2.2ghz opteron for example)?
>
> no. with slowest available AMD64 CPU it will still be much
> overpowered. consider using that machine for other tasks too.
>
> but you will need motherboard with something better than 33Mhz 32-
> bit PCI and lots of ATA/SATA ports, or extra controllers plugged if
> you like this server to really be able to do 1000Mbit/s speed.
yes, PCI-X and Areca 1130 12 port SATA Raid card.
I wonder how FreeBSD compares to Solaris 10 for nfs serving.
"Client" servers are a mix of FreeBSD and Solaris 10.
Thanks
Chad
>
>> card. I assume lots of RAM for the OS to use to cache would be
>> desirable and GB ethernet.
>>
> all depends of the type of workload. in case of mostly large file
> streamed big cache won't help much. in case mostly small subset of
> files will be used, big cache may be a benefit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list