processes not getting fair share of available disk I/O
kris at obsecurity.org
Wed Dec 13 17:23:46 PST 2006
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:37:42PM +0000, Dieter wrote:
> > > Is Giant the only mutex/lock that could be a bottleneck across disks?
> > The only one I can think of that is generic. One would have to do
> > more extensive profiling and diagnosis to try and figure out what is
> > wrong with your system.
> Suggestions of what to look at would be welcome.
Mutex profiling would show if there is a mutex somehow getting in the
way of your I/O (e.g. if Giant is somehow being forced). I dont think
it would show anything though. You can try to study interrupt issues
(e.g. look for an interrupt storm during I/O) with vmstat -i. Other
than that you'd probably have to get your hands dirtier in the code.
> > The only explanation that seems to fit is that it's something to do
> > with your particular hardware (i.e. driver issue), since it's
> > certainly not a problem on general configurations.
> > I know that many people have bad things to say about nforce chipsets,
> > although I dont know if your particular problem has been reported
> > before.
> Could APIC have anything to do with this? It is currently turned off in
Problems with interrupt delivery could certainly be relevant.
> Today I experimented with vfs.hirunningspace. If I crank it up, I get
> better total write speed with multiple drives doing dd from /dev/zero
> to files on disks. But it doesn't help my real applications, and
> in fact appears to hurt them.
Yes, I don't expect there are any viable high-level workarounds for
this issue at a lower layer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20061214/6ddb84ef/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions