portupgrade stale dependencies
Andrew P.
infofarmer at gmail.com
Fri Oct 28 03:42:39 PDT 2005
On 10/28/05, Gerard Seibert <gerard at seibercom.net> wrote:
>
> Personally, I feel that portmanager does a much better job of updating
> without the problems that seem to crop up so often using portupgrade.
>
I've always been scared off by the comparatively
young age of portmanager. Besides, portupgrade
comes with a set of useful tools, like cvsweb
browser.
But the fat ruby dependency and some other things
make me want something else. I'd be glad to see
a perl-based ports management system. Maybe
I'll write one some day :-)
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list