6.0 release date and stability
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Oct 22 12:57:00 PDT 2005
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:52:19PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On 22 Oct Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 03:41:33PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:30:52 -0400
> > > Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > But he old libraries are still on the system than, aren't they?
> > > > > Or will they not be used and if not, why?
> > > >
> > > > Use libchk and pkg_which..see their manpages.
> > >
> > > After looking into the manual(s) this seems to be a "dangerous" or at
> > > least not an easy operation. Can someone be a little more specific
> > > about how to remove old 4.x / 5.x libraries from a FreeBSD system?
> >
> > That's the best there is for 6.0 (so run a full backup first). 7.0
> > has a 'make delete-old' target that removes known old files from your
> > base system. I don't know if netchild has plans to backport it, but
> > you could ask him.
>
> OK, thanks for this answer. I may be overreacting ;-)
> Is it Ok to say that after *recompiling* each port with "portupgrade
> -fa" on a 5.4 system updated to 6.0 old libraries will no be dangerous
> in a way that they would be used any longer?
Yes. You can verify this with libchk.
> Should I remove the compat-options from the kernel before or after the
> recompilation of all ports?
After you're sure nothing uses them any longer, or you'll have a
partly broken system in the meantime.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051022/a8e7f48f/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list