6.0R todo list - hash sizes

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Oct 1 08:57:54 PDT 2005


On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:50:31AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> > 
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>scottl@ removed:
> >>    <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small
> >>     hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td>
> >>
> >>this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits
> >>to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then?
> > 
> > 
> > It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not
> > the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago.
> > 
> > Kris
> > 
> 
> Somewhat off topic - what's the status of 6.0? The info on
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html
> Has not been updated in some time and we're still on Beta5

The status is that we're still on beta5, and the bugs listed in the
todo list need to be fixed.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051001/590b5010/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list