xterm conflicts with xorg-clients
keramida at ceid.upatras.gr
Mon Nov 14 18:25:26 GMT 2005
On 2005-11-14 13:07, Mike Hernandez <sequethin at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:59:40PM +0000, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
>> I don't think so. Keep track of which ports you deleted the
>> dependencies from, then when you have the whole
>> xorg-clients/xterm mess sorted out, just force a re-install of
>> those packages and the right dependencies will come back.
>> Time consuming, but not rocket science ;-)
>> I had to do something like that when interrupting
>> gnome_upgrade early seems to bugger everything a treat, but I
>> got everything back OK (I think!).
> Great ;) I'm still working on my first year with freebsd so
> this a great learning experience. Without getting too far OT,
> is there a quick explanation as to why xterm is a separate
> port? Does it take up so much space that it would "bloat" a
> standard Xorg/Xfree install?
New releases of xterm are made far more often than full X11
releases, so it makes more sense I guess. Every time a new
version of xterm is out, you don't really need to download &
rebuild monster-tarballs with all the X11 sources. A simple
portupgrade invocation takes care of updating just xterm:
# portupgrade -vuN xterm
That's probably why it's a separate port.
PS: Please, ignore the automatically forced 'footer' below. It's
automatically added by the Exchange server I'm behind of and has
no relation whatsoever to non-work email I post.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, do not forward
this email to any other person, delete this
e-mail and destroy all copies. Any dissemination or use of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized and may be illegal.
More information about the freebsd-questions