cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)
Kirk Strauser
kirk at strauser.com
Wed Nov 9 19:13:54 GMT 2005
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote:
> If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
> it.
Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10
times the changes?
Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason in the world
why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of ports
from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap today?
--
Kirk Strauser
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051109/83ac54ea/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list