cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

[Kirk Strauser]

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote:

> If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
> it.

Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10 
times the changes?

Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap.  Is there any reason in the world 
why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of ports 
from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap today?
-- 
Kirk Strauser
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051109/83ac54ea/attachment.bin