ULE or 4BSD

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:42:40PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote:
> On 11/5/05, Albert Shih <shih at math.jussieu.fr> wrote:
> > Hi anybody
> >
> > All is in the subject...on FreeBSD 6.0 i've see the default generic kernel
> > is compiled with SCHED_4BSD and SCHED_ULE is in comment.
> >
> > Can'I use SCHED_ULE on 6.0 ? Is he stable now ?
> >
> > Regards.
> > --
> > Albert SHIH
> > Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
> > U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
> > Heure local/Local time:
> > Sat Nov 5 10:05:36 CET 2005
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> >
> 
> Not yet, no, sorry. It's pretty stable now that 6.0 is
> out, but you'll have to conduct extensive testing
> (yourself) before you put it in production, where it
> might give you a noticable performance boost.

Or slowdown, as in my testing.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051105/bae12846/attachment.bin