Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE
mailing-lists at msdi.ca
Fri Nov 4 13:26:26 GMT 2005
Sorry about the rc.conf mistake, I should sleep more at night instead
of typing stupidities :)
I was meaning
I am running freebsd 5.4 amd64 version
Should there be a big improvement from running ULE ?, nobody reported
the bug I have with it ?
At 03:38 2005-11-04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:58:58PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64
> > as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the
> > system starts to behave strangely.
> > During boot, named and sshd can't start normally, system is unstable, etc
> > Is that a known bug or isnt it suppose to work anyway on this kind of
> > system ?
>You forgot to mention what version of FreeBSD you're running. Also,
>you don't control the scheduler from rc.conf, it's compiled into your
>Anyway, SCHED_ULE is better on 6.0 than on previous releases, but it's
>still not officially supported, and there are some known problems with
More information about the freebsd-questions