can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Denny White
dennyboy at cableone.net
Fri May 20 11:04:14 PDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
here's some of my bookmarks from dru lavigne's
stuff at oreilly on working with ports. the one
on portupgrade really helped jumpstart my learning
it.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/07/FreeBSD_Basics.html
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/09/18/FreeBSD_Basics.html
===================================
Unix is like a wigwam. No gates,
no windows, and an apache inside.
===================================
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:17:32AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote:
>> Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
>>
>>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:36:58AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> yes sorry i jumped in without reading the man page for it's useage.
>>>>> however some digging and a few other helpful emails and TA DA!!! it
>>>>> works!!!
>>>>> i portupgraded freetype2, and then firefox built successfully.
>>>>> i was under the impression that portupgrade looked after
>>>>> dependencies like this on it's own however?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you tell it to..again, please see the manpage :)
>>>>
>>>> Kris
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Specifically:
>>>
>>> -R
>>> --upward-recursive Act on all those packages required by the
>>> given
>>> packages as well. (When specified with -F,
>>> fetch
>>> recursively, including the brand new,
>>> uninstalled
>>> ports that an upgraded port requires)
>>>
>>> The man page is your friend.
>>>
>>> --Alex
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>> don't i need to be wary of -R ?? wholesale upgrading of library's might
>> break other apps that use them
>
> It's *always* a good idea to update your ports with your brain turned
> on :-)
>
> portupgrade -a is often safer, because it won't update a port but
> leave other dependencies of that port than the one you specified
> untouched.
>
> Kris
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFCjiaay0Ty5RZE55oRAj+AAKC9wzfw+v4vJVSK1FX8rDWu+46IGgCgmeGY
FNi5kyTLkoF0/a5uWN1AhPk=
=MCVh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list