Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

[Michael C. Shultz]

On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:49 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>  > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented,
>  > but
> >
> > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
> > on the various options.
> >
> > here is an example:
> >
> > # all-depends-list
> > #                         - Show all directories which are
> > dependencies #                                 for this port.
> >
> > then
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/lang/ezm3/
> > make all-depends-list
> >
> > result:
> >
> > /usr/ports/converters/libiconv
> > /usr/ports/devel/gettext
> > /usr/ports/devel/gmake
> > /usr/ports/devel/libtool15
> >
> > -Mike
>
> Mike,
>
> That's great info, thank you. It really helps put this into
> perspective.
>
> I did portmanager -sl and it identifies 7 candidates for deletion.
> It identifies cvsup-without-gui and also identifies ezm3 upon which
> it depends. Am I missing something here or shouldn't ezm3 not been
> identified as a "leaf port"?
>
> Jay

ezm3 is a build dependency most likely, meaning once cvsup-without-gui
is built it no longer needs ezm3, runs fine without it.

-Mike