feedback on a good DNS server
mark at darklogik.org
Thu Mar 10 08:03:09 PST 2005
> > Dan has given explicit permission to read, compile, modify and use
> > the source code of djbdns.
> From http://www.qmail.org/not-open-source.html:
> "For a program to be "open source", you must be able to, among other
> things, change the source and redistribute it. DJB prohibits
> distribution of modified code and so programs which are so-licensed are
> not open source."
> In other words, people who aren't the Free Software Foundation or OSI also
> agree that Dan's license isn't an Open Source license. As I said, though,
> whether that's good, bad, or irrelevant is up to the administrator. It's
> just something that many people aren't aware of but would be interested in.
I suppose it's also a matter of the definition of 'Open Source'. For me,
open source equates to 'I can read the code to see if it's trustworthy
and can compile it so I know that I got what I read' but you're right,
it doesn't pass the 'official' definition.
B776 43DC 8A5D EAF9 2126 9A67 A7DA 390F DEFF 9DD1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 825 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050310/50ad5407/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions