httpd and memory usage
tom.hurst at clara.net
Wed Jun 15 00:19:33 GMT 2005
* David Banning (david+dated+1119209345.99f472 at skytracker.ca) wrote:
> > You might also consider switching to something like lighttpd, which
> > uses a single process that's generally about 1/3 the size of an
> > equivilent httpd process.
> I like these ideas. Thanks. What is the downside, if any, to using
> lighttpd? Is it difficult to configure?
No, it's very easy to get working, especially with FastCGI; it's just
not quite as flexible as Apache in many respects. This isn't always (or
even usually) a bad thing, but it depends what your needs are.
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
More information about the freebsd-questions