motherboard fbsd 5.x
Roland Smith
rsmith at xs4all.nl
Sat Jul 16 13:47:41 GMT 2005
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:17:01PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
<snip>
> From what I understand there are still some problems with AMD64
> boards. Still, 64bits is the future.. so is it better to wait a while,
> _or_ are there *good* supported motherboards for amd64?
Avoid boards with NForce chipsets. My MSI NEO FSR mobo with
K8T800 chipset (MS-6702) works like a charm.
> Maybe it's better to stay with Intel and FreeBSD?
I've had no problems with amd64 since 5.3-RELEASE.
> And about harddisks: is it true that fbsd support for ATA harddisks is
> better / more robust than for SATA drives?
Not AFAICT. My aforementioned mobo has a VIA SATA controller:
atapci0 at pci0:15:0: class=0x010400 card=0x70201462 chip=0x31491106
rev=0x80 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc'
device = 'VT8237 VT6410 SATA RAID Controller'
class = mass storage
subclass = RAID
It works fine with my WD harddisk:
Master: ad4 <WDC WD1200JD-00GBB0/02.05D02> Serial ATA v1.0
> I need some *concrete* advice. The rest of the hardware will be a
> lesser problem.
HTH,
Roland
--
R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text.
public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050716/05fe1c0b/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list