FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued
linicks at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 17:04:32 PST 2005
> The move to an MPSAFE VFS will help with that a lot, I should think.
Do you know if this will find it's way to 5.x in the near future?
> Also, while on face value this may seem odd, could you try the following
> additional variables:
> - Layer the test UFS partition directly over ad0 instead of ad0s1a
> - UFS1 vs UFS2
I just tested with UFS1 and had almost the exact same results.
> Finally, in as much as is possible, make sure that the layout of the disks
> is approximately the same -- as countless benchmarking papers show, there
> are substantial differences (10%+) in I/O throughput depending on where on
> the disk surface operations occur. That's one of the reasons to try UFS1
> for the test partition, although not the only one.
My tests use the exact same disk layout, and hardware. However, I
have had consistent results on all 4 boxes that I have tested on.
At this point I'm making the assumption that the poor disk I/O
performance on 5.3 isn't a file system issue, but is tied to a larger
issue with the Kernel (I know never make assumptions ... :)). In all
my testing, I have noticed that 5.3 doesn't appear to release cpu
resources even if there isn't any other demand for resources. I would
compare it to driveling a car with a governor on it. When I tested
with 4.11, it allocated considerably more resources. I do hope that
the 5.x issues are resolved soon so that I can deploy may production
servers on it rather than starting on 4 and them making the big
switch. I will probably test 6 for the fun of it.
More information about the freebsd-questions