different behaviour between 4.x and 5.x (ping response/disk io) [was Re: ]

stheg olloydson stheg_olloydson at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 19 21:30:03 PST 2005


it was said

> Just a few day ago i installed NetBSD 2.0 to make a final stroke to
> my decision as i got this computer on the 16. of november. Main
> advantage in my opinion is that raidframe performs better than vinum
(at least 
> with my setup and with the tests i performed). There are some other 
> topics but mainly subjective and not the matter of this email. I
> guess i'm going to stick with it, developers and time will do the
rest for me. :)
> But what's most important is that your mail gave me the confidence
> that my hardware isn't faulty. It's also very nice that you shed some
> light on the that whole network subject.

Glad to be of help. Raidframe had been ported to FBSD 5.x, but it was
removed because kernel changes broke it, and no one volunteered to fix
it. I think gvinum replaced vinum in 5.3 for the same reason. I don't
use software raid, so I don't really know.
But NBSD 2.0 is very nice. A company that I do consulting for has just
chosen it as the OS for a new embedded product in their pipeline. I've
been toying with the idea of idea of web-enabling my toaster by hooking
up temperature sensors and a camera, so web surfers could make toast at
my house. I was going to use a 8051 chip and write the code, but maybe
I'll use NBSD on an embedded board. (Someday, I may want to add the
sprinkler system, pool pump,....)
 
>> P.S. (to the list in general) Why do all of the questions about FBSD

>>performance, especially 4.x vs 5.x, come from people posting from
>> Windows boxes? Theories?
> 
> In my case i'm using windows because it's pre-installed on the laptop
> i use and i never had luck with *bsd/linux on the desktop (and
> especially laptops). 

This was meant as a humorous question because of certain Windows users'
not well-reasoned or -argued posts on this very topic in the last few
days.

> Well, enough said. (Maybe i'll make some space free for FreeBSD 5.3
> to give a try but i'm not to optimistic that it will suffice my
needs)

Different tools for different jobs. Although, in the thread you
referenced, you said you were having major SMP problems with NBSD. I
hope you get those sorted. Those, I would think, are worse than any
network and vinum performance problems. In any event you may wish to
check back when 5.4 is released. (No release schedule yet.)
 
> Thanks for your kind assistance and best regards,

>Jochen Keil

You're welcome and see you on the 'net.

stheg

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list