Thank you!

[Nikolas Britton]

Freebsd0101 at aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, zettel at acm.org 
>writes:
>  
>
>>>still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
>>>that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.
>>>      
>>>
>>Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed yet.
>>Is 5.3 on its fastest supported chipset faster or slower than 4.10 on
>>its fastest supported chipset?
>>    
>>
>----
>Thats a sad commentary, if the "new" version of FreeBSD is 5% faster on 
>a hardware platform that should be 30% faster. Is that the goal you seek?
>
>so you have to pay 50% more to get the same performance on 5.3. Thats
>quite a selling point!
>  
>

Is that you Tm4528 at aol.com?, whats TM for btw, Troll Master?