5.3-STABLE?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:11:26AM +0900, Choy Kho Yee wrote:
> On 2004/10/18, at 2:11, Radek Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Mark Frank wrote:
> >>Yesterday I did a fresh install off of a 5.3beta5 CD and them before
> >>going to bed last night I cvsup'ed with a "*default release=cvs
> >>tag=RELENG_5" and a buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel cycle.
> >>
> >>I had expected to end up with 5.3beta7 but to my surprise I ended up 
> >>with
> >>a "uname -a" of:
> >>
> >>FreeBSD guinness.local.mark-and-erika.com 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 
> >>5.3-STABLE #0:
> >>Sun Oct 17 02:47:12 EDT 2004
> >>root at guinness.local.mark-and-erika.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC 
> >>i386
> >>
> >>Do I really have 5.3-STABLE or am I missing something? I can't find
> >>any announcement on the freebsd.org web site.  Is this really
> >>5.3-STABLE?  I assumed there would be a 5.3-RC1...or is this it?
> >
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033698.html
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033702.html
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033703.html
> >
> >-Radek
> 
> Sorry but I am not very sure about this after reading the above CVS 
> commit messages.
> Does that mean if we don't want to follow the -STABLE branch but would 
> like to stick
> to 5.3-RELEASE, this is the time to change the tag to "RELENG_5_3" or 
> else we would
> end up with -STABLE?

Yes.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20041017/c8eef33b/attachment.bin