Probelms and Inconsistencies with Portupgrade

Aeefyu afu-subscribed-list at aeefyu.net
Wed Mar 24 18:14:00 PST 2004


Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2004 07:00 pm, Aeefyu wrote:
>>
>>"portupgrade -Rv <dir>/<package>" ie. upgrading a package seems to be
>>working fine, however. It seems to only affect "portinstall"
>>
>>I have reinstall manually portupgrade and ruby* (using make install
>>clean), rebuild INDEX with "portsdb -Uu" and "pkgdb -fu" or "pkgdb
>>-F". Even went to the extent of blowing my /usr/ports and cvsup all
>>over again. However, :
>>1. my /usr/ports/INDEX has the following as its first few lines:
>>*** Error code 1|||||||
>>Stop in /usr/ports/databases.|||||||
>>Stop in /usr/ports.||||||
>>
>>2. portsdb -Uu reports hundred of make_index error.
>>
>>So, as it is - i cant install new stuff via portupgrade "portinstall
>>-Rv <package>". I seem to be able to maintain it though i.e.
>>"portupgrade -Rv <package>". Anyone can shed light on this matter?
> 
> 
> There was a time where a "make index" was doing this. Have you tried 
> recvsuping ports-all. You need a good index for portupgrade to work. My 
> cron job that updated my mirror at 1020 UTC produced an INDEX that 
> built without any errors.

Yes. Have blown /usr/ports twice and re-cvsup ports-all. 
/usr/ports/INDEX is correct upon update. "portsdb -Uu" will somehow 
introduce errors into it.

> 
>>I think it might be  related to my very very outdated
>>/var/db/pkg/*/CONTENT .. but its just a guess . I cant blow it and
>>start all over again, right? Too risky, this is a production machine.
> 
> 
> That might affect something else in the pkgtools but not the index. I 
> have always used 
> cd /usr/ports
> make index
> portsdb -u
> 
> The latest portsdb -U uses make index to build INDEX or INDEX-5.

Yes, that was what I was led to believe the function of the command 
"portsdb -Uu" :)
However, running that command nowadays seems to corrupt the INDEX :(

I have found a new quirk with my portupgrade:
Running "portinstall -Rv <PACKAGE00>" will actually update all PACKAGE00 
dependencies (if needed), however, it wont actually install PACKAGE00. 
No errors. No build. Strange.

[1012][root at beta: ports]$ portinstall -Rv editors/vim-lite
--->  Session started at: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:12:49
** No need to upgrade 'libiconv-1.9.1_3' (>= libiconv-1.9.1_3). (specify 
-f to force)
** No need to upgrade 'libtool-1.3.5_2' (>= libtool-1.3.5_2). (specify 
-f to force)
--->  Reporting the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
         - converters/libiconv (libiconv-1.9.1_3)
         - devel/libtool13 (libtool-1.3.5_2)
--->  Session ended at: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:12:52  (consumed 00:00:03)

-- 
Feisal
Webcraft Solutions - http://www.webcraftsolutions.com
--------------------------------------
Feel disillusioned?  I've got some great new illusions ...


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list