1 processor vs. 2

Chuck McManis cmcmanis at mcmanis.com
Wed Mar 3 10:36:05 PST 2004


At 05:53 AM 3/3/2004, Danny Pansters wrote:
>RAID5 on 3 disks? That's useless.

Its only mostly useless. You can't mirror (RAID-1) three drives, so if you 
want some resiliency you can use RAID-5 and give up one disk to parity and 
get two disks worth of data.
You could even do RAID4 on three disks. 'course 4 disks is generally the 
minimum most people talk about, but its not completely useless.

--Chuck



More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list