bkhl at elektrubadur.se
Sun Jul 18 11:58:40 PDT 2004
Bill Moran <wmoran at potentialtech.com> writes:
>> (Where tun0 is the interface of my ADSL connection.)
> Is tun0 the real interface?
No, the actual card is rl0:
rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::2e0:4cff:feb0:5d5b%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1492
inet 220.127.116.11 --> 18.104.22.168 netmask 0xffffffff
Opened by PID 53
Is it the actual NIC that should be put in $nat_interface?
> What happens if you start it manually? Are there any entries in
> /var/log/messages to tell you why it didn't start automatically?
> Looking at the output at system startup, there should be some
> indication of why natd didn't start.
Nope. There's nothing helpful there that I can see. Only this seems
Jul 18 17:13:36 calliope /kernel: IP packet filtering initialized, \
divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, \
logging limited to 10 packets/entry by default
...and that seems right.
> Are you saying that your internal machines _can_ get to the net when
> you delete that rule? If so, then you don't need nat, and you need to
> reconsider your configuration.
I need NAT, because I need machines inside the LAN to serve certain
ports. (15000, as you can see from the line from natd.conf.)
More information about the freebsd-questions