How dangerous is 5.2 for production use

Peter Risdon peter at
Fri Jan 23 01:45:39 PST 2004

Matthew Seaman wrote:

> Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
>you have than UFS1.  I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
>is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm or
>deny that.
I'm sure this is right. If one of my 5.* machines has an un-clean 
shutdown it states that it is starting background fsck checks as it 
completes its boot process.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list