Commercial Distribution?

[Larry Rosenman]

--On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 19:15:37 +0530 Shantanoo 
<freebsd at dhumketu.cjb.net> wrote:

> +++ Scott W [freebsd] [06-01-04 22:39 -0500]:
>| I know this one may be seen as sacrilege to some, but think about this:
>|
>| 1.  *BSD uses a fairly significant amount of GNU and GPL licensed
>| (opposed to the BSD license) code in it.  gcc, Perl, XFree86, Apache,
>| GNU Make, autoconf, mysql, PostgreSQL, etc etc.  While it can be argued
>| many/most of these are not part of the core OS, what about:  gcc,
>| objective c, libreadline, cvs, diff, tar, sort, patch and friends?
>| (from /usr/src/gnu and /usr/src/usr.bin )
>
> I think PostgreSQL is released under BSD license.
It *IS* under the BSD license, and that won't change :-) (It's an
RWAR every time it's mentioned to put it GPL).
(I spend a lot of time on the PostgreSQL lists.).



-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler at lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20040107/ee85cac6/attachment.bin