superfluous libraries?
Robert Huff
roberthuff at rcn.com
Wed Dec 29 11:00:44 PST 2004
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> > ** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3
> > /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 <- ?
> > /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.7e_1
> > --> This may be an undesirable situation
> > Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this)
> >
> > Is there any reason not to delete the versions that came from
> > openssl-0.9.7e_1? Obviously I don't want to delete the port, but
> > these particular files?
>
> It sounds like you don't want to use the port's version of the
> libraries.
I see no reason to have two copies of the same object around,
(except for backup, which isn't the case here). I'd also like to
get rid of the warnings. :-)
> If that's the case, you *can* delete the port.
I was reluctant to delete the port because it also has a bunch
of header (.h) files et al.. If those come with the base
distribution, then I _can_ delete the port without harm.
Thanks.
Robert Huff
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list