CPUTYPE directive options in /etc/make.conf

Subhro subhro.kar at gmail.com
Tue Dec 28 19:19:19 PST 2004


Yeh that would further optimize the compiled code. Go ahead and use it.

Regards
S.

Indian Institute of Information Technology
Subhro Sankha Kar
Block AQ-13/1, Sector V
Salt Lake City
PIN 700091
India
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questions at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 7:33
> To: freebsd-questions
> Subject: CPUTYPE directive options in /etc/make.conf
> 
> In regards to using the 'CPUTYPE=' directive in the '/etc/make.conf' file,
> would it be advisable to use the CPU type; i.e., p2 for instance rather
> than i686. This is assuming that the processor is detected by FreeBSD as
> an Intel PII, i686 as an example.
> 
> Is there an advantage to using the 'p?' designation over the numeric
> (i686) designation?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Gerard Seibert
> gerard-seibert at rcn.com
> 
> An architect's most useful tools are an eraser at the drafting board, and
> a wrecking bar at the site
> 
> - Frank Lloyd Wright
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3677 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20041229/c0bff1ac/smime.bin


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list