BSD equivalents of autoconf, automake, etc.

[Jonathon McKitrick]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:51:06PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote:
: Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: 
: >This is exactly what I needed.  I wanted to experiment with building,
: >installing, linking, and the same with my own test 'libraries.'  It looks
: >like this is much easier than autoconf.
: 
: Why do you want to use autoconf at all, if you want to build on only one 

At first I was only going to start a new personal project, and that can be
BSD only.

: system?  Autoconf (and automake/libtool) was, as originally intended, 
: designed to ease cross-platform portability.

I'm starting to wonder.  But if I want to work on my new project at home,
I'll need to come up with some kind of a system.  It'll be running on Linux
at work, and BSD at home.

Besides, it will need a professional looking/acting installation script when
it is done, and it will have to work on both platforms.


jm
--
I love feminist movements, especially when I'm walking behind them.