Beginning C++ in FreeBSD
dgw at liwest.at
Tue Apr 20 13:29:58 PDT 2004
On Saturday 17 April 2004 15:30, Dan MacMillan wrote:
> From: Daniela
> Sent: April 17, 2004 04:50
> > OO languages can be optimized differently than non-OO languages, and
> > when you translate one language into another, this advantage gets lost.
> I challenge you to defend this claim with a specific example.
I don't really have a specific example, but it's quite the same with human
languages. The more often a text is translated, the more useless information
gets added to it. And if the original text is beautifully written, it is
often total crap when you translate it back.
> > I would rather say, assembly is fast and can be portable, if it's done
> > properly.
> How does one properly do an assembly language program for the x86
> instruction set (for example) so that it will run on a StrongARM?
I only mean that if you do it right, you can write code that can easily be
made to run on similar architectures, or different operating systems.
More information about the freebsd-questions