Performance impact with SCHED_ULE in 5.1?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:24:29PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

> On the production systems we use FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10.
> 
> Does anybody recognized similar problems?

FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE, and the ULE scheduler, are experimental
works-in-progress.  Significant ULE improvements have been made in
5.1-CURRENT and are ongoing.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20031017/98d9df89/attachment.bin