wmoran at potentialtech.com
Fri Jun 27 19:32:14 PDT 2003
Brett Glass wrote:
> At 06:43 PM 6/27/2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>You're supposed to boot into single-user mode to repair the
>>filesystems before attempting to bring it up to multiuser state.
> Ah... but you're not there at the exact moment when the power
> comes back on. (Maybe it was just a flicker and there was no
> UPS, or maybe the power company -- like ours -- is so slow to
> fix outages that the UPS battery was fully drained.)
Normally, fsck is able to automatically handle the problem after
a dirty shutdown. In all the dirty shutdowns I've seen, I've only
had to manually run fsck maybe twice.
As far as the power sit is concerned: if you have a UPS and you
don't have some sort of monitoring software to gracefully shutdown
the machine during extended outages, you're shooting yourself in
the foot! Kind of like getting a car with all the fancy safety
features so you can drink a bottle of vodka before you drive.
Regardless, isn't this the reason background fsck was developed in 5?
> What's more, even if you CAN boot into single user mode and run
> fsck, it can be frustrating. Sometimes a partition takes two
> or three passes to clean up.
Yeah, that is a PITA, but I can understand the reason.
> Sometimes fsck randomly refuses
> to work on one. It's a mess.
Never had that happen.
> Ideally, the system would handle the logistics. It's not as if
> powering down without shutting down is that rare of an
Really? Doesn't happen all that often to me.
More information about the freebsd-questions