No /proc or procfs by default in 5.1-RELEASE ... why ?
Josh Brooks
user at mail.econolodgetulsa.com
Tue Jul 15 23:42:47 PDT 2003
Hello,
As I am sure many have noticed, a default installation of 5.1-RELEASE will
leave you with no procfs mounted at /proc, and no entry in /etc/fstab for
a procfs.
Is this by design ?
Is it better to not run /proc on 5.x ?
What are the consequences of running without a procfs on 5.x ?
OR
Was this just a bug/oversight in the 5.1-RELEASE, and in reality we should
definitely be running a procfs and have an entry in /etc/fstab, etc. ?
This is with the GENERIC kernel, but other kernels I build with PROCFS
also do not result in a procfs existing either - I always have to manually
mount it.
Any commnts of any kind related to the design decision that may have been
behind this - or any explanation of a kind as to why the 5.1-RELEASE has
no procfs mounted or in fstab by default is much apprecaited!
thanks!
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list