anyone uses fsck_y_enable="YES" ?

[Michal F. Hanula]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 06:28:55PM +0800, Edy Lie wrote:
> Do you guys use this option ?
> Is it any useful ?
I remember a server in a hospital across the town that had no UPS and
went down about once a week due to the backup generator tests (they just
turned off the power, waited ten minutes and turned it on. If the number
of casualties was below a certain treshold, the generator was considered
to be OK). About half the times the proxy cache fs was fscked up and had
to be fscked back down manually. 

Since I've added fsck_y_enable, the server works.

(Order fsck_y_enable now and you will get this hostname= FOR FREE.)
							m&f

- -- 
What do you care what other people think?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/EpTx4PY2BaN84VwRAmEuAJ0bLgBxxBjMTpiutNt4qGRqU6tgqACfa58h
1A8dQnup0ldVAPNMJa82p68=
=sief
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----