spamassassin slow to process messages

Andrew Thomson ajthomson at optushome.com.au
Mon Jul 7 16:57:17 PDT 2003


On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:37, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote:
> 
> > I've got a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (930.32-MHz
> > 686-class CPU) and I'm seeing performance like,
> > 
> > Jul  8 08:25:11 athomson spamd[52016]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
> > ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 2132 bytes. 
> 
> Well, that's pretty bad.  I see:
> 
> Jul  7 04:05:49 wopr spamd[66708]: identified spam (8.4/5.0) for mph:501 in 4.0 seconds, 1206 bytes. 
> Jul  7 04:08:18 wopr spamd[66726]: clean message (-5.3/5.0) for mph:501 in 7.1 seconds, 2553 bytes. 
> 
> This is on a Cyrix 6x86 (166 MHz 486-class CPU) with no L2 cache.  :-)
> 
> Is the machine heavily loaded with other work?  Assuming that there are
> no messages between the ones you posted, it doesn't look like the machine
> is overburdened by mail alone.

we're back in business...

Jul  8 09:50:11 athomson spamd[52899]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 3044 bytes. 
Jul  8 09:50:28 athomson spamd[52912]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 10.3 seconds, 5840 bytes. 
Jul  8 09:54:35 athomson spamd[52952]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 0.3 seconds, 3027 bytes. 
Jul  8 09:54:43 athomson spamd[52965]: clean message (1.3/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 0.4 seconds, 8524 bytes. 

put
use_razor1 0
use_razor2 0
in my local config and now it goes real fast!!

thanks for the tips..

so what is this razor business anyway??

ajt.




More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list