About ports QA by 'port test'
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Sun Mar 14 19:48:11 UTC 2010
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:19:15 +0200
chukharev at mail.ru wrote:
> Recently I've been trying to run some additional tests during updating
> the ports I have installed on my computer. That means I select a
> number of oldest installed ports (using dates of directories
> in /var/db/pkg/), and for each of them run 'port
> test' (ports-mgmt/porttools) and then 'portupgrade -f'.
>
> FYI, the 'port test' uses portlint, builds in a different place,
> installs into a different place, packages, then de-installs and
> checks for left files. No jail, no chroot.
>
> From what I have seen till now, about 25% of the ports do not pass
> the test, either for fatal errors from portlint or due to errors
> exhibited because of PREFIX and PKG_DBDIR variables. And this is done
> only for the ports I have successfully installed on my system for
> some reason not connected to the QA purposes.
>
> I do not want to trouble the port maintainers with direct e-mails.
>
> I've been posting the results (and the original description I'm
> modifying now) to freebsd-qa@ for a while, but that turned out to be
> of some burden and also I received there no feedback at all.
> Therefore I set a webpage at my day-job where I will copy the results.
> I hope I will not need to keep the site for long, if running 'port
> test' is found useful, it should be added into QAT or tinderbox, I
> think. Though without jail it is faster I guess.
>
> The URL: http://kemia.me.tut.fi/~chu/FreeBSD.port_tests/
> Current statistics:
>
> Ports having fatal errors: 109 (21 %)
> Ports having warnings: 216 (43 %)
> Ports without fatal errors: 391 (78 %)
> Ports having warnings or fatal errors: 325 (65 %)
> Totally tested ports: 500
I will take a look at your work the following days.
> Additionally to the above stats, java/jdk16 is interactive and hangs
> on input despite of BATCH=yes in /etc/make.conf.
Yes, I noticed this today.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-qa/attachments/20100314/127e8a7f/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-qa
mailing list