airport estreme with Freebsd

[Mauro]

On Sun, 2005-06-02 at 20:59 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:18:06PM -0700, Mauro wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-05-02 at 16:29 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:08:04AM -0700, Mauro wrote:
> > > > I don't buy the theory about government frequencies.  This theory asks
> > > > one to believe that government frequencies are not intercepted or
> > > > tampered with in some fashion.  They are tampered with and can be done
> > > > so easily.  Legally sold scanners enable one to listen in to all sorts
> > > > of private signals.
> > > 
> > > One, don't top post -- it looses context.  This isn't a Mickysoft list.
> > > 
> > > Two isssue isn't necessarily about receiving certain frequencies as you
> > > assume.  As Peter said one of the issues is the FCC doesn't want you to
> > > set the TRANSMITTING POWER above a certain power.
> > 
> > To clarify my statement concerning ethnocentrism,
> > don't assume we're all american and that the FCC dictates to
> > non-americans their ideas concerning radio waves.  So on a global level,
> > the excuse that the FCC doesn't approve doesn't wash.
> 
> It sure does then the company in question is a USA company.  They
> certainly *ARE* under the FCC's regulatory jurisdiction.
> 

Really, so I assume you would hold that American companies who benefit
from overseas sweat shops and child labour follow american regulatory
agencies dictates (considering that clothing manufacturing occurs
overseas as with computer manufacturing)?