modules?

[Andrew Gallatin]

Peter Grehan writes:
 >   I was going to ask ruslan if this was the correct place to commit
 > this CFLAGS change. However, if you think it's OK, I'll do it.

Please do.  Whenever I've made a change like this in the past, I've
always managed to do it wrong ;_

 >   The second is a gcc patch, since internal libcalls (e.g. 64-bit arith)
 > don't respect the "-mlongcall" attribute. I've yet to file a bug against
 > gcc for this one.
 > 
 > diff -u -r1.1.1.9 rs6000.c
 > --- rs6000.c    7 Nov 2003 02:43:04 -0000       1.1.1.9
 > +++ rs6000.c    15 Jul 2004 03:40:09 -0000
 > @@ -2914,6 +2914,9 @@
 >         && lookup_attribute ("longcall", TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (fntype))
 >         && !lookup_attribute ("shortcall", TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (fntype)))
 >       cum->call_cookie = CALL_LONG;
 > +  else if (!fntype)
 > +    if (rs6000_default_long_calls)
 > +      cum->call_cookie = CALL_LONG;
 > 
 >     if (TARGET_DEBUG_ARG)
 
Have you talked to obrien or kan about getting this patch
into at least our local version of gcc after you've filed the bug?

Thanks,

Drew