portsnap depreciation

[Carmel NY]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +0000, Pau Amma stated:
>On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote:
>> Is 'portsnap'
>> going to be depreciated?  
>
>Yes.
>
>> If so, when?  
>
>I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent 
>-current.
>
>> If is is depreciated, how will
>> this affect poudriere?  
>
>See 
>https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree 
>and the next sections.

According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have
Poudriere create a default ports tree for itself, using either
portsnap(8) (if running FreeBSD 12.1 or 11.4) or Subversion (if running
FreeBSD-CURRENT)" Am I to understand that if I am running 11.4-RELEASE,
I cannot use subversion?

-- 
Carmel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20200918/a82c3f12/attachment.sig>