Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?
David Wolfskill
david at catwhisker.org
Mon Oct 5 23:45:05 UTC 2020
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:31:05AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In my case,
> -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] is added to portmaster because all packages that
> install kernel modules contain -kmod in their names. This excludes *-kmod.
> And when they are upgraded, I won't be installing them right away.
>
> Then to install them I write PORTS_MODULES in src.conf.
> PORTS_MODULES=\
> graphics/drm-fbsd12.0-kmod\
> graphics/gpu-firmware-kmod
>
> They are created at the same time as the kernel.
> ....
But in order for them to be built, you need to have updated
ports-mgmt/pkg ahead of time, or this kind of thing happens:
| ...
| --- kernel.full ---
| linking kernel.full
| ctfmerge -L VERSION -g -o kernel.full ...
| text data bss dec hex filename
| 22900304 1840729 3667344 28408377 0x1b17a39 kernel.full
| Building /common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY/kernel.debug
| Building /common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY/kernel
| --- all ---
| ===> Ports module x11/nvidia-driver (all)
| cd ${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports}/x11/nvidia-driver; env -u CC -u CXX -u CPP -u MAKESYSPATH -u MK_AUTO_OBJ -u MAKEOBJDIR MAKEFLAGS="-j 16 -J 15,16 -j 16 -J 15,16 -D NO_MODULES_OBJ .MAKE.LEVEL.ENV=MAKELEVEL KERNEL=kernel TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64" SYSDIR=/usr/src/sys PATH=/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/bin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/sbin:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin SRC_BASE=/usr/src OSVERSION=1202502 WRKDIRPREFIX=/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY make -B clean build
| ===> Cleaning for nvidia-driver-440.100_1
| ===> nvidia-driver-440.100_1 pkg(8) must be version 1.15.9 or greater, but
| you have 1.15.8. You must upgrade the ports-mgmt/pkg port first.
| *** Error code 1
|
| Stop.
Hence my query: Is an UPDATING entry warranted when MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION is
bumped?
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill david at catwhisker.org
"the end of the pandemic is in sight" -- Donald Trump (while infected
with SARS-COV-2)
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20201005/6efab006/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list