RFD: proposed new (likely virtual) category, education
Pau Amma
pauamma at gundo.com
Sat Jul 18 18:16:29 UTC 2020
On 2020-07-18 15:41, Don Wilde wrote:
> On 7/18/20 5:21 AM, Pau Amma wrote:
>> On 2020-07-18 06:22, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>>> On 18/07/2020 1:09 pm, Pau Amma wrote:
>>>> This category would comprise ports that are mainly educational in
>>>> nature
>>>> or purpose, such as:
>>>> - course-writing or course-delivery applications,
>>>> - classroom or school management applications (eg, scheduling
>>>> classes),
>>>> - applications, utilities, or games primarily or substantially
>>>> designed
>>>> to help the user learn a specific topic or study in general, like
>>>> typing
>>>> tutors, flashcard applications, or educational games.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Great idea Pau!
>>>
>>> You might like to add www/sakai though its quite dated (ports is
>>> 10.2;
>>> current version 20.1)
>>
>> Indeed. Not sure how I missed it, thanks. I'll wait a few more days
>> before filing a PR, in case I missed something else or there's an
>> objection.
>
> I, too, love the idea. I would suggest that a sub-category of
> "suggested learning path" programs might be an asset as well,
> including useful languages to examine.
Can you give me examples of which ports would go into that 4th
subcategory?
> We might also consider
> resurrecting Knuth's code+language concepts and tools.
I'd wait until that category gets off the ground to consider that.
> Assuming this category is accepted, I would then suggest an
> announcement post to the FreeBSD-advocacy@ and FreeBSD-women@ lists,
> and perhaps notification to the KDE and EduBuntu core lists. :D
I'm not sure why FreeBSD-women. Can you elaborate?
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list