portsnap

Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com
Mon Dec 28 15:39:12 UTC 2020


On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:37 AM Patrick M. Hausen <hausen at punkt.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> > Am 26.12.2020 um 20:04 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports <
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org>:
> > ...and I will continue to use portmaster. But I don't understand why
> > we should no keep portsnap.
>
> Kudos to Stefan for keeping portmaster relevant and up-to-date.
> But I never understood the appeal of portsnap. What's the advantage over
>
> svnlite co ...
> cd /usr/ports; make update
>
> This mechanism is in the base system, so an extra tool demands some
> justification ;-)
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
> --
> punkt.de GmbH
> Patrick M. Hausen
> .infrastructure
>
> Kaiserallee 13a
> 76133 Karlsruhe
>
> Tel. +49 721 9109500
>
> https://infrastructure.punkt.de
> info at punkt.de
>
> AG Mannheim 108285
> Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian Stein
>
> portsnap(8) predates svnlite by quite a bit, but you have just described
why it is not really worth the overhead of maintaining it. As bugzilla
describes many ticket closures, Overcome by events".
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list