portsnap

Stefan Esser se at freebsd.org
Sat Dec 26 18:51:42 UTC 2020


Am 26.12.20 um 18:41 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports:
> Hi!
> 
> Today I red again an email:
> 
> Subject:    [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap
> From:       Steve Wills <swills () FreeBSD ! org>
> Date:       2020-08-04 18:43:20
> 
> And as portsnap user I have a question: Do they planning deprecation of
> portmaster too?

No, I'm actively working on portmaster and have rewritten it from
scratch for better performance (and additional features, e.g. building
in a clean chroot jail, similar to synth or poudriere).

I have been using that version for more than one year, but the
functionality is not complete, yet.

On a test system with > 2200 installed ports it takes less than 10
seconds to identify the ~600 out-of-date ports (that I keep in this
state for testing of the upgrade strategy function), which is more
than 30 times faster than the same operation with the "official"
portmaster.

Until completion of that version, I'll continue to maintain and
update the current portmaster port ...

Regards, STefan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20201226/d916edb9/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list