make.conf for a poudriere jail and CPUTYPE

[tech-lists]

Was advised on -questions that this list might be better for this type of
query. Please note that btver1 is still amd64

----- Forwarded message from tech-lists <tech-lists at zyxst.net> -----

Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:16:24 +0100
From: tech-lists <tech-lists at zyxst.net>
To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make.conf for a poudriere jail and CPUTYPE
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:33:36PM +0100, tech-lists wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If I'm building ports on a poudriere and the jail I'm building for has say
> Host CPU: btver1 and the host running poudriere is Host CPU: sandybridge, is
> there any benefit or advantage in defining CPUTYPE?= in the jail's make.conf?
> 
> If yes, which programs does it benefit? I guess maybe openssl

thought I'd experiment. Seems setting CPUTYPE?=btver1 causes some ports to
fail at the configure or build stage. python36 and lzo2 for example. Unsure
why that should be (or where to ask???)

-- 
J.

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20190928/d93c2afb/attachment.sig>