Dovecot packages
@lbutlr
kremels at kreme.com
Thu May 23 08:16:11 UTC 2019
On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org> wrote:
> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and dovecot2 package has remained stagnant.
You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE.
I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your ports tree matches the current ports.
Ah, yes, from the man -8 portsnap:
extract Extract a ports tree, replacing existing files and
directories. NOTE: This will remove anything occupying the
location where files or directories are being extracted; in
particular, any changes made locally to the ports tree (for
example, adding new patches) will be silently obliterated.
===>
Only run this command to initialize your portsnap-maintained
ports tree for the first time, if you wish to start over
with a clean, completely unmodified tree, or if you wish to
extract a specific part of the tree (using the path option).
===>
--
Whoever had created humanity had left in a major design flaw. It was its
tendency to bend at the knees. --Feet of Clay
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list