Dovecot packages

@lbutlr kremels at kreme.com
Thu May 23 08:16:11 UTC 2019


On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org> wrote:
> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and dovecot2 package has remained stagnant.  

You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE.

I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your ports tree matches the current ports.

Ah, yes, from the man -8 portsnap:

     extract      Extract a ports tree, replacing existing files and
                  directories.  NOTE: This will remove anything occupying the
                  location where files or directories are being extracted; in
                  particular, any changes made locally to the ports tree (for
                  example, adding new patches) will be silently obliterated.

===>
                  Only run this command to initialize your portsnap-maintained
                  ports tree for the first time, if you wish to start over
                  with a clean, completely unmodified tree, or if you wish to
                  extract a specific part of the tree (using the path option).
===>

-- 
Whoever had created humanity had left in a major design flaw. It was its
tendency to bend at the knees. --Feet of Clay




More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list